Confidential - Investor Materials

Problem Validation Report

Milsim.AI: Synchronized Multimodal Dataset Platform

Version: 1.0 Date: January 2026

Milsim.AI addresses a critical bottleneck in AI development: the severe shortage of synchronized, real-world multimodal datasets for training embodied AI systems. By leveraging the global airsoft/milsim community as a voluntary data collection network, we create high-quality, ethically-sourced training data that defense AI, robotics, and simulation companies desperately need.

01

Problem Statement

The Core Problem

AI companies cannot build effective embodied intelligence systems because they lack access to synchronized, multi-agent, real-world operational data.

The development of autonomous systems, military AI, and advanced robotics is fundamentally constrained by data availability. While computer vision has ImageNet and language models have the internet, embodied AI has no equivalent large-scale, multimodal dataset.

Why This Problem Exists

Barrier 01

Real Military Data is Classified

Defense departments cannot share operational footage for commercial AI training. AAR data is restricted, and multi-sensor battlefield recordings are state secrets.

Barrier 02

Synthetic Data Has Limits

Domain gap between simulation and reality causes model failures. Synthetic data will supply 60% of training data, but the remaining 40% real-world data is the bottleneck.

Barrier 03

Existing Datasets Are Inadequate

DROID: only 75k episodes. Driving datasets focus on vehicles. No existing dataset captures coordinated multi-agent tactical scenarios.

Barrier 04

Collection is Prohibitively Expensive

Video licensing: $1-4/minute. Annotation: $1-5/item. Multi-view setups cost millions. Coordinating hundreds of participants is impossible.

02

Market Signals Indicating Demand

Defense AI Funding Explosion

Company Valuation Recent Funding Focus Area
Anduril $30.5B $2.5B (2024) Autonomous weapons systems
Shield AI $5.6B $540M (2024) AI pilots for aircraft
Scale AI $14B - Defense data labeling
Helsing ~$5B $450M (2024) European defense AI

Sources: Fortune - Anduril, Shield AI

$1.8B
DoD AI Budget FY2025
+63.6%
YoY Increase
$3B
Defense Tech VC 2024
+11%
YoY Growth

Robotics Companies Need Real-World Data

Training Data Costs Are Skyrocketing

"AI training data has a price tag that only Big Tech can afford" - TechCrunch, June 2024

3D/4D Reconstruction Requirements

03

Customer Pain Points (Validated)

Pain Point 1: Data Scarcity

Critical

Who: Defense AI companies, robotics startups, simulation developers

"Industrial robotic applications face a fundamental challenge: each new task effectively creates a new domain requiring fresh data collection" - Label Studio

Cannot train models without data. This is the #1 blocker for embodied AI development.

Pain Point 2: Synchronization Challenges

High

Who: Multi-agent system developers, 3D reconstruction researchers

DROID uses identical hardware across all 13 institutions to ensure consistency. 4D Gaussian Splatting requires precise temporal alignment across viewpoints. Unsynchronized data is unusable for many applications.

Pain Point 3: Ethical Sourcing

High

Who: All AI companies facing regulatory scrutiny

"Companies training on unlicensed footage are running many risks" - TechCrunch

EU copyright framework requires consent for training data. Legal exposure and reputational risk are mounting.

Pain Point 4: Scenario Diversity

Medium-High

Who: Military simulation companies, game developers

MAN TruckScenes created specifically because autonomous driving datasets don't cover trucks. Models trained on limited scenarios fail in deployment.

04

Problem Quantification

Total Addressable Problem

Sector Annual Data Spend Data Gap
Defense AI $500M+ Multi-agent tactical scenarios
Autonomous Vehicles $300M+ Edge cases, human interactions
Robotics $200M+ Real-world manipulation
Game Development $150M+ Motion capture, realistic AI
Total $1.15B+

Cost of the Problem

For Defense AI Companies:

For Robotics Companies:

05

Why Now?

Technology Enablers

Enabler 01

GPS Atomic Clock Precision

Nanosecond accuracy enables frame-perfect synchronization. At 60fps (16.67ms per frame), well within GPS sync tolerance. QR codes encode timestamps for post-hoc alignment.

Enabler 02

Smartphone Sensors

Modern smartphones have GPS, accelerometer, gyroscope, magnetometer, barometer. High-quality cameras capable of 4K/60fps. Sufficient for training data requirements.

Enabler 03

Affordable Action Cameras

GoPro-class devices: $200-400. Adequate quality for 3D reconstruction. Rugged enough for airsoft operations.

Enabler 04

AI Infrastructure Maturity

Cloud processing for video at scale. Established pipelines for multimodal data. Growing ecosystem of data marketplaces.

Market Timing

06

Competitive Landscape

Approach Cost Scale Quality Ethical Sourcing
Military exercises Very High Limited Excellent Classified
Professional actors High Limited Good Yes
Synthetic generation Medium Unlimited Domain gap issues Yes
Scraped internet video Low Large Variable Legal risk
Milsim.AI Low Large High Yes

Conclusion

The problem is validated across multiple dimensions:

01

Market signals: Billions in funding flowing to companies constrained by data

02

Customer pain: Documented across defense, robotics, and simulation sectors

03

Timing: Technology enablers and market conditions align

04

Competitive gap: No existing solution addresses multi-agent, synchronized, multimodal tactical data

The AI industry needs what we can uniquely provide: ethically-sourced, perfectly-synchronized, multi-agent operational data at scale.

References